On Tue, 15 May 2001, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > Alexander Viro wrote: > > > > On 15 May 2001, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > > > > > isofs wouldn't be too bad as long as struct mapping:struct inode is a > > > many-to-one mapping. > > > > Erm... What's wrong with inode->u.isofs_i.my_very_own_address_space ? > > > > None whatsoever. The one thing that matters is that noone starts making > the assumption that mapping->host->i_mapping == mapping. One actually shouldn't assume that mapping->host is an inode. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: Getting FS access events Stephen C. Tweedie
- Re: Getting FS access events Richard Gooch
- Re: Fwd: Re: Getting FS access events Matthias Urlichs
- Re: Getting FS access events Linus Torvalds
- Re: Getting FS access events Alexander Viro
- Re: Getting FS access events David Woodhouse
- Re: Getting FS access events Chris Mason
- Re: Getting FS access events H. Peter Anvin
- Re: Getting FS access events Alexander Viro
- Re: Getting FS access events H. Peter Anvin
- Re: Getting FS access events Alexander Viro
- Re: Getting FS access events H. Peter Anvin
- Re: Getting FS access events Alexander Viro
- Re: Getting FS access events H. Peter Anvin
- Re: Getting FS access events Alexander Viro
- Re: Getting FS access events Linus Torvalds
- Re: Getting FS access events H. Peter Anvin
- Re: Getting FS access events Linus Torvalds
- Re: Getting FS access events Jan Harkes
- Re: Getting FS access events Lars Brinkhoff
- Re: Getting FS access events Kai Henningsen