Alexander Viro wrote:
>
> On 15 May 2001, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>
> > isofs wouldn't be too bad as long as struct mapping:struct inode is a
> > many-to-one mapping.
>
> Erm... What's wrong with inode->u.isofs_i.my_very_own_address_space ?
>
None whatsoever. The one thing that matters is that noone starts making
the assumption that mapping->host->i_mapping == mapping.
-hpa
--
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> at work, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> in private!
"Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot."
http://www.zytor.com/~hpa/puzzle.txt
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: Getting FS access events Rogier Wolff
- Re: Getting FS access events Stephen C. Tweedie
- Re: Getting FS access events Richard Gooch
- Re: Fwd: Re: Getting FS access events Matthias Urlichs
- Re: Getting FS access events Linus Torvalds
- Re: Getting FS access events Alexander Viro
- Re: Getting FS access events David Woodhouse
- Re: Getting FS access events Chris Mason
- Re: Getting FS access events H. Peter Anvin
- Re: Getting FS access events Alexander Viro
- Re: Getting FS access events H. Peter Anvin
- Re: Getting FS access events Alexander Viro
- Re: Getting FS access events H. Peter Anvin
- Re: Getting FS access events Alexander Viro
- Re: Getting FS access events H. Peter Anvin
- Re: Getting FS access events Alexander Viro
- Re: Getting FS access events Linus Torvalds
- Re: Getting FS access events H. Peter Anvin
- Re: Getting FS access events Linus Torvalds
- Re: Getting FS access events Jan Harkes
- Re: Getting FS access events Lars Brinkhoff

