Followup to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
By author: Alexander Viro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
>
> UNIX-like ones (and that includes QNX) are easy. HFS is hopeless - it won't
> be fixed unless authors will do it. Tigran will probably fix BFS just as a
> learning experience ;-) ADFS looks tolerably easy to fix. AFFS... directories
> will be pure hell - blocks jump from directory to directory at zero notice.
> NTFS and HPFS will win from switch (esp. NTFS). FAT is not a problem, if we
> are willing to break CVF and let author fix it. Reiserfs... Dunno. They've
> got a private (slightly mutated) copy of ~60% of fs/buffer.c. UDF should be
> OK. ISOFS... ask Peter. JFFS - dunno.
>
isofs wouldn't be too bad as long as struct mapping:struct inode is a
many-to-one mapping.
-hpa
--
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> at work, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> in private!
"Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot."
http://www.zytor.com/~hpa/puzzle.txt
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
