Hi, On Thu, May 10, 2001 at 01:43:46PM -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > No. __GFP_FAIL can to try to reclaim pages from inactive clean. > > We just want to avoid __GFP_FAIL allocations from going to > try_to_free_pages(). Why? __GFP_FAIL is only useful as an indication that the caller has some magic mechanism for coping with failure. There's no other information passed, so a brief call to try_to_free_pages is quite appropriate. --Stephen - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- [PATCH] allocation looping + kswapd CPU cycles Mark Hemment
- Re: [PATCH] allocation looping + kswapd CPU... Alex Bligh - linux-kernel
- Re: [PATCH] allocation looping + kswapd CPU... Marcelo Tosatti
- Re: [PATCH] allocation looping + kswapd... Jens Axboe
- Re: [PATCH] allocation looping + kswapd... David S. Miller
- Re: [PATCH] allocation looping + ks... Mark Hemment
- Re: [PATCH] allocation looping ... Marcelo Tosatti
- Re: [PATCH] allocation loo... Mark Hemment
- Re: [PATCH] allocation... Marcelo Tosatti
- Re: [PATCH] alloca... Stephen C. Tweedie
- Re: [PATCH] alloca... Marcelo Tosatti
- Re: [PATCH] alloca... Stephen C. Tweedie
- Re: [PATCH] alloca... Marcelo Tosatti
- Re: [PATCH] alloca... Stephen C. Tweedie
- Re: [PATCH] allocation looping + ks... Rik van Riel