Hi, On Thu, May 10, 2001 at 03:49:05PM -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > Back to the main discussion --- I guess we could make __GFP_FAIL (with > __GFP_WAIT set :)) allocations actually fail if "try_to_free_pages()" does > not make any progress (ie returns zero). But maybe thats a bit too > extreme. That would seem to be a reasonable interpretation of __GFP_FAIL + __GFP_WAIT, yes. --Stephen - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: [PATCH] allocation looping + kswapd CPU cycles Jens Axboe
- Re: [PATCH] allocation looping + kswapd CPU cycles David S. Miller
- Re: [PATCH] allocation looping + kswapd CPU cycles Mark Hemment
- Re: [PATCH] allocation looping + kswapd CPU cy... Marcelo Tosatti
- Re: [PATCH] allocation looping + kswapd CP... Mark Hemment
- Re: [PATCH] allocation looping + kswap... Marcelo Tosatti
- Re: [PATCH] allocation looping + ... Stephen C. Tweedie
- Re: [PATCH] allocation looping + ... Marcelo Tosatti
- Re: [PATCH] allocation looping + ... Stephen C. Tweedie
- Re: [PATCH] allocation looping + ... Marcelo Tosatti
- Re: [PATCH] allocation looping + ... Stephen C. Tweedie
- Re: [PATCH] allocation looping + kswapd CPU cycles Rik van Riel