Am Donnerstag, 25. April 2013, 19:28:55 schrieb Arnd Bergmann:
> The s3c24xx_init_intc and s3c2412_init_irq functions are only called
> at init time, and they call functions already marked __init, so they
> should be marked in the same way. This was reported as
>
> WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x19e0b4): Section mismatch in reference from the
> function s3c2412_init_irq() to the function
> .init.text:s3c24xx_init_intc.constprop.8() The function s3c2412_init_irq()
> references
> the function __init s3c24xx_init_intc.constprop.8().
> This is often because s3c2412_init_irq lacks a __init
> annotation or the annotation of s3c24xx_init_intc.constprop.8 is wrong.
>
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <a...@arndb.de>
> Cc: Heiko Stuebner <he...@sntech.de>
> Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene....@samsung.com>
Yeah, it seems "someone" forgot these, thanks for catching this.
Acked-by: Heiko Stuebner <he...@sntech.de>
> ---
> drivers/irqchip/irq-s3c24xx.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-s3c24xx.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-s3c24xx.c
> index c8afd7b..bbcc944 100644
> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-s3c24xx.c
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-s3c24xx.c
> @@ -535,7 +535,7 @@ static void s3c24xx_clear_intc(struct s3c_irq_intc
> *intc) }
> }
>
> -static struct s3c_irq_intc *s3c24xx_init_intc(struct device_node *np,
> +static struct s3c_irq_intc * __init s3c24xx_init_intc(struct device_node
> *np, struct s3c_irq_data *irq_data,
> struct s3c_irq_intc *parent,
> unsigned long address)
> @@ -795,7 +795,7 @@ static struct s3c_irq_data init_s3c2412subint[32] = {
> { .type = S3C_IRQTYPE_LEVEL, .parent_irq = 21 }, /* CF */
> };
>
> -void s3c2412_init_irq(void)
> +void __init s3c2412_init_irq(void)
> {
> pr_info("S3C2412: IRQ Support\n");
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
