The newly rewritten get_property() function causes a bogus warning
from gcc-3.8, which cannot figure out that "level" is always
initialized at the point where it gets evaluated:
drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c: In function 'get_property':
drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c:189:37: warning: 'level' may be used
uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
if (property == GET_FREQ && level == j) {
^
Slightly rearranging the code makes this more obvious and
avoids the warning.
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <a...@arndb.de>
Cc: Zhang Rui <rui.zh...@intel.com>
Cc: Amit Daniel kachhap <amit.dan...@samsung.com>
---
drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c | 17 +++++++++--------
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c b/drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c
index 768b508..34878e6 100644
--- a/drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c
+++ b/drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c
@@ -165,10 +165,6 @@ static int get_property(unsigned int cpu, unsigned long
input,
return 0;
}
- if (property == GET_FREQ)
- level = descend ? input : (max_level - input -1);
-
-
for (i = 0, j = 0; table[i].frequency != CPUFREQ_TABLE_END; i++) {
/* ignore invalid entry */
if (table[i].frequency == CPUFREQ_ENTRY_INVALID)
@@ -186,10 +182,15 @@ static int get_property(unsigned int cpu, unsigned long
input,
*output = descend ? j : (max_level - j - 1);
return 0;
}
- if (property == GET_FREQ && level == j) {
- /* get frequency by level */
- *output = freq;
- return 0;
+
+ if (property == GET_FREQ) {
+ level = descend ? input : (max_level - input -1);
+
+ if (level == j) {
+ /* get frequency by level */
+ *output = freq;
+ return 0;
+ }
}
j++;
}
--
1.8.1.2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
