> > The swap I have is 2 partitions, one on each drive both with a priority of > > 0. Personally, I like the way it's done on my box. > > So you've spent almost $200 for RAM, and refuse to spend $4 for 1Gb of > swap space. Fine with me. Stupid argument. Very stupid argument. Take a 16Gb server. You now want to buy 64Gb of hard disk for the swap. Only because of partition limits you'll beed at least 2 disks entirely dedicated to it, which also means a controller a larger PSU and a bigger case. The swap behaviour of 2.4 is a bug. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: 2.4 and 2GB swap partitio... David S. Miller
- Re: 2.4 and 2GB swap partitio... Rik van Riel
- Re: 2.4 and 2GB swap partitio... Roger Larsson
- Re: 2.4 and 2GB swap partitio... Rik van Riel
- Re: 2.4 and 2GB swap partitio... Albert D. Cahalan
- Re: 2.4 and 2GB swap partitio... Rogier Wolff
- Re: 2.4 and 2GB swap partitio... Jonathan Lundell
- Re: 2.4 and 2GB swap partitio... Kenneth Johansson
- Re: 2.4 and 2GB swap partitio... David Lang
- Re: 2.4 and 2GB swap partitio... Rogier Wolff
- RE: 2.4 and 2GB swap partitio... Alan Cox
- RE: 2.4 and 2GB swap partition limit Matt_Domsch
- Re: 2.4 and 2GB swap partition limit Christoph Rohland
- Re: 2.4 and 2GB swap partition limit Matti Aarnio
- Re: 2.4 and 2GB swap partition limit Rik van Riel
- Re: 2.4 and 2GB swap partition limit Rik van Riel
- Re: 2.4 and 2GB swap partition limit Christoph Hellwig
- Re: 2.4 and 2GB swap partition limit Andries . Brouwer
- RE: 2.4 and 2GB swap partition limit Torrey Hoffman
- RE: 2.4 and 2GB swap partition limit Richard B. Johnson
- RE: 2.4 and 2GB swap partition limit David S. Miller