On 5 Mar 2001, Christoph Rohland wrote: > > We've also seen (anecdotal evidence here) cases where a kernel > > panics, which we believe may have to do with having 0 < swap < 2x > > RAM. We're investigating further. > > That would be a kernel bug which should be fixed. The kernel should > handle oom/oos. There was a bug which made the OOM-killer not work for some workloads. It should be fixed in the latest -ac kernels... If in doubt, please test ;) regards, Rik -- Virtual memory is like a game you can't win; However, without VM there's truly nothing to lose... http://www.surriel.com/ http://www.conectiva.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com.br/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: 2.4 and 2GB swap partitio... Albert D. Cahalan
- Re: 2.4 and 2GB swap partitio... Rogier Wolff
- Re: 2.4 and 2GB swap partitio... Jonathan Lundell
- Re: 2.4 and 2GB swap partitio... Kenneth Johansson
- Re: 2.4 and 2GB swap partitio... David Lang
- Re: 2.4 and 2GB swap partitio... Rogier Wolff
- Re: 2.4 and 2GB swap partitio... Alan Cox
- RE: 2.4 and 2GB swap partition limit Matt_Domsch
- Re: 2.4 and 2GB swap partition limit Christoph Rohland
- Re: 2.4 and 2GB swap partition limit Matti Aarnio
- Re: 2.4 and 2GB swap partition limit Rik van Riel
- Re: 2.4 and 2GB swap partition limit Rik van Riel
- Re: 2.4 and 2GB swap partition limit Christoph Hellwig
- Re: 2.4 and 2GB swap partition limit Andries . Brouwer
- RE: 2.4 and 2GB swap partition limit Torrey Hoffman
- RE: 2.4 and 2GB swap partition limit Richard B. Johnson
- RE: 2.4 and 2GB swap partition limit David S. Miller
- RE: 2.4 and 2GB swap partition limit Richard B. Johnson
- Re: 2.4 and 2GB swap partition limit Andreas Ferber
- Re: 2.4 and 2GB swap partition limit Andi Kleen
- Re: 2.4 and 2GB swap partition limit Andreas Dilger