On 5 Mar 2001, Christoph Rohland wrote:
> > We've also seen (anecdotal evidence here) cases where a kernel
> > panics, which we believe may have to do with having 0 < swap < 2x
> > RAM. We're investigating further.
>
> That would be a kernel bug which should be fixed. The kernel should
> handle oom/oos.
There was a bug which made the OOM-killer not work for some
workloads. It should be fixed in the latest -ac kernels...
If in doubt, please test ;)
regards,
Rik
--
Virtual memory is like a game you can't win;
However, without VM there's truly nothing to lose...
http://www.surriel.com/
http://www.conectiva.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com.br/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: 2.4 and 2GB swap partitio... Albert D. Cahalan
- Re: 2.4 and 2GB swap partitio... Rogier Wolff
- Re: 2.4 and 2GB swap partitio... Jonathan Lundell
- Re: 2.4 and 2GB swap partitio... Kenneth Johansson
- Re: 2.4 and 2GB swap partitio... David Lang
- Re: 2.4 and 2GB swap partitio... Rogier Wolff
- Re: 2.4 and 2GB swap partitio... Alan Cox
- RE: 2.4 and 2GB swap partition limit Matt_Domsch
- Re: 2.4 and 2GB swap partition limit Christoph Rohland
- Re: 2.4 and 2GB swap partition limit Matti Aarnio
- Re: 2.4 and 2GB swap partition limit Rik van Riel
- Re: 2.4 and 2GB swap partition limit Rik van Riel
- Re: 2.4 and 2GB swap partition limit Christoph Hellwig
- Re: 2.4 and 2GB swap partition limit Andries . Brouwer
- RE: 2.4 and 2GB swap partition limit Torrey Hoffman
- RE: 2.4 and 2GB swap partition limit Richard B. Johnson
- RE: 2.4 and 2GB swap partition limit David S. Miller
- RE: 2.4 and 2GB swap partition limit Richard B. Johnson
- Re: 2.4 and 2GB swap partition limit Andreas Ferber
- Re: 2.4 and 2GB swap partition limit Andi Kleen
- Re: 2.4 and 2GB swap partition limit Andreas Dilger

