At 2:04 PM -0400 2001-04-28, Albert D. Cahalan wrote: >It is a disaster waiting to happen. Instead of having the offending >process get killed, your machine could suffer extreme thrashing. > >Have enough swap for idle processes and no more. Let's altogether now say "working set". (Does Linux swap out text, by the way, he asks ignorantly?) -- /Jonathan Lundell. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: 2.4 and 2GB swap partitio... Stephen C. Tweedie
- Re: 2.4 and 2GB swap partitio... Hugh Dickins
- Re: 2.4 and 2GB swap partitio... Stephen C. Tweedie
- Re: 2.4 and 2GB swap partitio... Rik van Riel
- Re: 2.4 and 2GB swap partitio... David S. Miller
- Re: 2.4 and 2GB swap partitio... Rik van Riel
- Re: 2.4 and 2GB swap partitio... Roger Larsson
- Re: 2.4 and 2GB swap partitio... Rik van Riel
- Re: 2.4 and 2GB swap partitio... Albert D. Cahalan
- Re: 2.4 and 2GB swap partitio... Rogier Wolff
- Re: 2.4 and 2GB swap partitio... Jonathan Lundell
- Re: 2.4 and 2GB swap partitio... Kenneth Johansson
- Re: 2.4 and 2GB swap partitio... David Lang
- Re: 2.4 and 2GB swap partitio... Rogier Wolff
- Re: 2.4 and 2GB swap partitio... Alan Cox
- RE: 2.4 and 2GB swap partition limit Matt_Domsch
- Re: 2.4 and 2GB swap partition limit Christoph Rohland
- Re: 2.4 and 2GB swap partition limit Matti Aarnio
- Re: 2.4 and 2GB swap partition limit Rik van Riel
- Re: 2.4 and 2GB swap partition limit Rik van Riel
- Re: 2.4 and 2GB swap partition limit Christoph Hellwig