> I've always been trying to convice people that 2x RAM remains a good
> rule-of-thumb.
IMO this is pointless
total used free shared buffers cached
Mem: 517456 505332 12124 111016 97752 236884
-/+ buffers/cache: 170696 346760
Swap: 131048 23216 107832
Of course for me, I'm not about to waste 1gb of disk space for swap.
The swap I have is 2 partitions, one on each drive both with a priority of
0. Personally, I like the way it's done on my box.
--
Lab tests show that use of micro$oft causes cancer in lab animals
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: 2.4 and 2GB swap partition limit Xavier Bestel
- Re: 2.4 and 2GB swap partition limit Rogier Wolff
- Re: 2.4 and 2GB swap partition limit LA Walsh
- Re: 2.4 and 2GB swap partition limit Rik van Riel
- Re: 2.4 and 2GB swap partition limit Thomas Dodd
- Re: 2.4 and 2GB swap partition limit Hugh Dickins
- Re: 2.4 and 2GB swap partition limit Rik van Riel
- Re: 2.4 and 2GB swap partition limit Ingo Oeser
- Re: 2.4 and 2GB swap partition limit LA Walsh
- Re: 2.4 and 2GB swap partition limit Rogier Wolff
- Re: 2.4 and 2GB swap partition limit Wakko Warner
- Re: 2.4 and 2GB swap partition limit Rogier Wolff
- Re: 2.4 and 2GB swap partition limit Wakko Warner
- Re: 2.4 and 2GB swap partition limit Rogier Wolff
- Re: 2.4 and 2GB swap partition limit J . A . Magallon
- Re: 2.4 and 2GB swap partition limit Alan Cox
- Re: 2.4 and 2GB swap partition limit Christoph Rohland
- Re: 2.4 and 2GB swap partition limit Rik van Riel
- Re: 2.4 and 2GB swap partition limit Stephen C. Tweedie
- Re: 2.4 and 2GB swap partition limit Rogier Wolff
- Re: 2.4 and 2GB swap partition limit Stephen C. Tweedie

