> I've always been trying to convice people that 2x RAM remains a good > rule-of-thumb. IMO this is pointless total used free shared buffers cached Mem: 517456 505332 12124 111016 97752 236884 -/+ buffers/cache: 170696 346760 Swap: 131048 23216 107832 Of course for me, I'm not about to waste 1gb of disk space for swap. The swap I have is 2 partitions, one on each drive both with a priority of 0. Personally, I like the way it's done on my box. -- Lab tests show that use of micro$oft causes cancer in lab animals - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: 2.4 and 2GB swap partition limit Xavier Bestel
- Re: 2.4 and 2GB swap partition limit Rogier Wolff
- Re: 2.4 and 2GB swap partition limit LA Walsh
- Re: 2.4 and 2GB swap partition limit Rik van Riel
- Re: 2.4 and 2GB swap partition limit Thomas Dodd
- Re: 2.4 and 2GB swap partition limit Hugh Dickins
- Re: 2.4 and 2GB swap partition limit Rik van Riel
- Re: 2.4 and 2GB swap partition limit Ingo Oeser
- Re: 2.4 and 2GB swap partition limit LA Walsh
- Re: 2.4 and 2GB swap partition limit Rogier Wolff
- Re: 2.4 and 2GB swap partition limit Wakko Warner
- Re: 2.4 and 2GB swap partition limit Rogier Wolff
- Re: 2.4 and 2GB swap partition limit Wakko Warner
- Re: 2.4 and 2GB swap partition limit Rogier Wolff
- Re: 2.4 and 2GB swap partition limit J . A . Magallon
- Re: 2.4 and 2GB swap partition limit Alan Cox
- Re: 2.4 and 2GB swap partition limit Christoph Rohland
- Re: 2.4 and 2GB swap partition limit Rik van Riel
- Re: 2.4 and 2GB swap partition limit Stephen C. Tweedie
- Re: 2.4 and 2GB swap partition limit Rogier Wolff
- Re: 2.4 and 2GB swap partition limit Stephen C. Tweedie