Le 08 Mar 2001 14:05:25 +0100, Goswin Brederlow a écrit : > I believe the 2xRAM rule comes from the OS's where ram was only buffer > for the swap. So with 1xRAM you had a running system with 1xRAM > memory, so nothing is gained by that much swap. I think kernels 2.4.x came back to this behavior. > On Linux any swap adds to the memory pool, so 1xRAM would be > equivalent to 2xRAM with the old old OS's. no more true AFAIK Xav - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- 2.4 and 2GB swap partition limit Matt_Domsch
- Re: 2.4 and 2GB swap partition limit Kenneth Johansson
- Re: 2.4 and 2GB swap partition limit William T Wilson
- Re: 2.4 and 2GB swap partition limit Rogier Wolff
- Re: 2.4 and 2GB swap partition limit Goswin Brederlow
- Re: 2.4 and 2GB swap partition limit Xavier Bestel
- Re: 2.4 and 2GB swap partition lim... Rogier Wolff
- Re: 2.4 and 2GB swap partition... LA Walsh
- Re: 2.4 and 2GB swap parti... Rik van Riel
- Re: 2.4 and 2GB swap parti... Thomas Dodd
- Re: 2.4 and 2GB swap parti... Hugh Dickins
- Re: 2.4 and 2GB swap parti... Rik van Riel
- Re: 2.4 and 2GB swap parti... Ingo Oeser
- Re: 2.4 and 2GB swap parti... LA Walsh
- Re: 2.4 and 2GB swap parti... Rogier Wolff
- Re: 2.4 and 2GB swap partition... Wakko Warner