> So you've spent almost $200 for RAM, and refuse to spend $4 for 1Gb of > swap space. Fine with me. I put this much ram into the system to keep from having swap. I still say swap=2x ram is a stupid idea. I fail to see the logic in that. Disk is much much slower than ram and if you're writing all ram to disk that's also slow. I have a machine with 256mb of ram and no disk. It runs just fine w/o swap. Only reason I even had swap here is if I ran something that used up all my memory and it has happened. Since when has linux started to be like windows "our way or no way"? -- Lab tests show that use of micro$oft causes cancer in lab animals - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: 2.4 and 2GB swap partition limit LA Walsh
- Re: 2.4 and 2GB swap partition limit Rik van Riel
- Re: 2.4 and 2GB swap partition limit Thomas Dodd
- Re: 2.4 and 2GB swap partition limit Hugh Dickins
- Re: 2.4 and 2GB swap partition limit Rik van Riel
- Re: 2.4 and 2GB swap partition limit Ingo Oeser
- Re: 2.4 and 2GB swap partition limit LA Walsh
- Re: 2.4 and 2GB swap partition limit Rogier Wolff
- Re: 2.4 and 2GB swap partition limit Wakko Warner
- Re: 2.4 and 2GB swap partition limit Rogier Wolff
- Re: 2.4 and 2GB swap partition limit Wakko Warner
- Re: 2.4 and 2GB swap partition limit Rogier Wolff
- Re: 2.4 and 2GB swap partition limit J . A . Magallon
- Re: 2.4 and 2GB swap partition limit Alan Cox
- Re: 2.4 and 2GB swap partition limit Christoph Rohland
- Re: 2.4 and 2GB swap partition limit Rik van Riel
- Re: 2.4 and 2GB swap partition limit Stephen C. Tweedie
- Re: 2.4 and 2GB swap partition limit Rogier Wolff
- Re: 2.4 and 2GB swap partition limit Stephen C. Tweedie
- Re: 2.4 and 2GB swap partition limit Rogier Wolff
- Re: 2.4 and 2GB swap partition limit Stephen C. Tweedie