Hi Samuel, On Mon, 18 Mar 2013 00:39:07 +0100 Samuel Ortiz <sa...@linux.intel.com> wrote: > > > I assume that you are still using the for-next branch? > I will update for-next branch to be in sync with mfd-next until the 3.10 merge > window closes. After that I'll probably delete the mfd-2.6.git tree.
I meant "I assume that I should still fetch the for-next branch of ...sameo/mfd-next.git". If that has changed, please let me know. > > What branch should I use of that? > Ah, I didn't see that the remote tree still carries the mfd-2.6 branches, I'll > remove them. > Please use master. OK. I will do that from tomorrow. > > BTW, those two trees look very similar (in fact "diff -u <(git ls-remote > > mfd) <(git ls-remote mfd-fixes)" only shows a couple of differences in > > all the refs). You do realise that I can use 2 different branches of one > > tree, right (as can others)? > I understand that :) But using 2 trees rather than 2 separate branches is more > convenient to my personal workflow. No worries. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au
pgpEjSIpAxHYZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
