Hi Samuel, On Mon, 18 Mar 2013 01:11:02 +0100 Samuel Ortiz <sa...@linux.intel.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 10:45:20AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > On Mon, 18 Mar 2013 00:39:07 +0100 Samuel Ortiz <sa...@linux.intel.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > > I assume that you are still using the for-next branch? > > > I will update for-next branch to be in sync with mfd-next until the 3.10 > > > merge > > > window closes. After that I'll probably delete the mfd-2.6.git tree. > > > > I meant "I assume that I should still fetch the for-next branch > > of ...sameo/mfd-next.git". If that has changed, please let me know. > Sorry for the misunderstanding, I was not clear enough: mfd-next master is > replacing mfd-2.6 for-next and mfd-fixes master is replacing mfd-2.6 > for-linus. > So no need to pull mfd-next for-next. > > I deleted all branches but master from both mfd-next and mfd-fixes, so things > should be clearer now.
OK, I will fix this up for tomorrow. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au
pgp3bb2FmJ_F_.pgp
Description: PGP signature
