* Oleg Nesterov <o...@redhat.com> [2013-02-04 16:18:50]:

> On 02/04, Srikar Dronamraju wrote:
> >
> > * Oleg Nesterov <o...@redhat.com> [2013-01-31 20:18:32]:
> >
> > > Move tu->nhit++ from uprobe_trace_func() to uprobe_dispatcher().
> > >
> > > ->nhit counts how many time we hit the breakpoint inserted by this
> > > uprobe, we do not want to loose this info if uprobe was enabled by
> > > sys_perf_event_open().
> > >
> >
> > Though I dont see a problem with this change, It seems unnecessary for
> > me.
> >
> > Info from nhits is mostly for /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/uprobe_profile
> 
> It is only for uprobe_profile, yes, and it is useful. Why should we hide
> this info if this uprobe is used by perf?

Fine with me.

Steve, Masami, Do you have comments/suggestions on this. 
(Since kprobe_profile just accounts for kprobetracer and doesnt account
for perf record.)
May we should make a similar change in kprobetracer to keep things
similar.

-- 
Thanks and Regards
Srikar Dronamraju

> 
> > I am not sure how sys_perf_event_open() is making use of this?
> 
> I hope I'll send the final series today. From the changelog of the patch
> which actually turns the filtering on:
> 
>       Testing:
> 
>               # perf probe -x /lib/libc.so.6 syscall
> 
>               # perl -e 'syscall -1 while 1' &
>               [1] 530
> 
>               # perf record -e probe_libc:syscall perl -e 'syscall -1 for 
> 1..10; sleep 1'
> 
>               # perf report --show-total-period
>                       100.00%            10     perl  libc-2.8.so    [.] 
> syscall
> 
>       Before this patch:
> 
>               # cat /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/uprobe_profile
>                       /lib/libc.so.6 syscall                          79291
> 
>       A huge ->nrhit == 79291 reflects the fact that the background process
>       530 constantly hits this breakpoint too, even if doesn't contribute to
>       the output.
> 
>       After the patch:
> 
>               # cat /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/uprobe_profile
>                       /lib/libc.so.6 syscall                          10
> 
>       This shows that only the target process was punished by int3.
> 
> Oleg.
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to