On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 01:33:19PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote: > On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 02:18:08PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Thursday, January 10, 2013 12:51:59 PM Mark Brown wrote: > > > > Sounds sensible, yes - about what I'd expect. Is it possible to match > > > on CPUID or similar information (given that this is all in the SoC) > > > instead of ACPI, that might be more robust I guess? > > > This particular part may be present in different SoCs. > > Right, but I'd expect you could enumerate the SoCs? Someone might > decide to change the clock configuration for future SoCs anyway.
Well, they can use the same LPSS block with a different CPU but then we expect the ACPI IDs to change as well (so we can then make another set of clocks for those). -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
