On Thursday, January 10, 2013 12:51:59 PM Mark Brown wrote: > On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 01:54:41PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Thursday, January 10, 2013 02:38:37 PM Mika Westerberg wrote: > > > > 3. We make the acpi_create_platform_device() match on, lets say > > > "INT33C" (a partial match), and in such case it assumes that we are > > > running on Lynxpoint. It will then create platform device for > > > 'clk-lpt'. > > > > 4. Now the clk-lpt driver creates the clocks. > > > > 5. The SPI driver gets the clock it wants. > > > That sounds reasonable to me. Mark, what do you think? > > Sounds sensible, yes - about what I'd expect. Is it possible to match > on CPUID or similar information (given that this is all in the SoC) > instead of ACPI, that might be more robust I guess?
This particular part may be present in different SoCs. Thanks, Rafael -- I speak only for myself. Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
