On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 01:54:41PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Thursday, January 10, 2013 02:38:37 PM Mika Westerberg wrote:
> > 3. We make the acpi_create_platform_device() match on, lets say > > "INT33C" (a partial match), and in such case it assumes that we are > > running on Lynxpoint. It will then create platform device for > > 'clk-lpt'. > > 4. Now the clk-lpt driver creates the clocks. > > 5. The SPI driver gets the clock it wants. > That sounds reasonable to me. Mark, what do you think? Sounds sensible, yes - about what I'd expect. Is it possible to match on CPUID or similar information (given that this is all in the SoC) instead of ACPI, that might be more robust I guess?
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
