"J . A . Magallon" wrote: > > The same is with that ugly out: at the end > of the function. Just change all that 'goto out' for a return. Oh no, no, no. Please, no. Multiple return statements are a maintenance nightmare. Go back and look at the "checker" reports. Think about them. - - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: [PATCH] gcc-3.0 warnings Alan Cox
- Re: [PATCH] gcc-3.0 warnings J . A . Magallon
- Re: [PATCH] gcc-3.0 warnings Tim Waugh
- Re: [PATCH] gcc-3.0 warnings Ingo Oeser
- Re: [PATCH] gcc-3.0 warnings Bill Wendling
- Re: [PATCH] gcc-3.0 warnings Linus Torvalds
- Re: [PATCH] gcc-3.0 warnings J . A . Magallon
- Re: [PATCH] gcc-3.0 warnings Tim Wright
- Re: [PATCH] gcc-3.0 warnings Stephen Satchell
- Re: [PATCH] gcc-3.0 warnings Tim Wright
- Re: [PATCH] gcc-3.0 warnings Andrew Morton
- Re: [PATCH] gcc-3.0 warnings J . A . Magallon
- Re: [PATCH] gcc-3.0 warnings Tim Waugh
- Re: [PATCH] gcc-3.0 warnings Ion Badulescu
- Re: [PATCH] gcc-3.0 warnings Horst von Brand