Also sprach Alan Cox: } > - default: } > + default:; } } Agree - done } This kind of coding makes me want to cry. What's so wrong with: default: break; instead? The ';' is hard to notice and, if people don't leave the "default:" at the end, then bad things could happen... -- || Bill Wendling [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- [PATCH] gcc-3.0 warnings J . A . Magallon
- Re: [PATCH] gcc-3.0 warnings Alan Cox
- Re: [PATCH] gcc-3.0 warnings J . A . Magallon
- Re: [PATCH] gcc-3.0 warnings Tim Waugh
- Re: [PATCH] gcc-3.0 warnings Ingo Oeser
- Re: [PATCH] gcc-3.0 warnings Bill Wendling
- Re: [PATCH] gcc-3.0 warnings Linus Torvalds
- Re: [PATCH] gcc-3.0 warnings J . A . Magallon
- Re: [PATCH] gcc-3.0 warnings Tim Wright
- Re: [PATCH] gcc-3.0 warnings Stephen Satchell
- Re: [PATCH] gcc-3.0 warning... Tim Wright
- Re: [PATCH] gcc-3.0 warnings Andrew Morton
- Re: [PATCH] gcc-3.0 warnings J . A . Magallon
- Re: [PATCH] gcc-3.0 warning... Tim Waugh
- Re: [PATCH] gcc-3.0 warnings Ion Badulescu
- Re: [PATCH] gcc-3.0 warnings Horst von Brand