2012/12/7 Joe Perches <j...@perches.com>: > On Fri, 2012-12-07 at 07:04 -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: >> On Fri, Dec 07, 2012 at 12:47:36PM +0100, "Jan H. Schönherr" wrote: >> > Am 07.12.2012 03:51, schrieb Joe Perches: >> > > On Thu, 2012-12-06 at 16:19 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: >> > >> On Thu, 06 Dec 2012 15:37:30 -0800 >> > >> Joe Perches <j...@perches.com> wrote: >> > >>> Can you please pick this up for -next now and I'll >> > >>> redo my patches against -next for -rc1 so I'm not >> > >>> delayed until 3.9? >> > >> >> > >> It would be better to do things in the other order. >> > >> >> > >> a) Your patches perform mainly code-movement which doesn't cause >> > >> functional changes. Jan's patches are functional changes which >> > >> require more thought and testing and possible fixups. >> > > >> > > Fine by me. Jan? >> > >> > No problem. >> > >> > I agree with Andrew, that patches 9 to 14 could use indeed some >> > more eyeballs. >> > >> > Patches 1 to 8 are more straight-forward, and I would consider >> > these ready. However, they are also those, where I probably won't >> > have any trouble rebasing them on top of your changes. >> > >> > Anyway. Until now I always thought my patches will end up in the >> > queue of some maintainer, so that I don't have to bother about >> > _when_ posting my patches. Therefore: when should I repost a >> > version rebased on top of Joe's changes? >> >> You are correct, I'll end up queuing these up to my tree when 3.8-rc1 is >> out, > > Andrew suggested I send my patches at -rc2. > >> they will live in linux-next until 3.8-final is out, and then go to >> Linus for 3.9-rc1. Right now, my trees are frozen due to the merge >> window about to open up. Your patience is appreciated. > > I think it'd be easier for a single downstream > maintainer to coordinate these patch sets sequencing. > > You or Andrew might be better than you and Andrew. > > There is a small patch to printk that should likely > be applied in some form for -rc1 or earlier: > > Sylvain Munaut's (cc'd) print_time fix: > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/1845971/ > > I don't know of anything else that likely will > or should be applied before -rc1. > > Frederic Weisbecker (also cc'd) has a printk nohz > patch series that merits some consideration too. > https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/10/20/94 > https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/11/14/646 > I don't know if Ingo pulled it in somewhere or not.
He has not yet pulled. But it's ready to be pulled and is on linux-next. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
