Am 07.12.2012 03:51, schrieb Joe Perches: > On Thu, 2012-12-06 at 16:19 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: >> On Thu, 06 Dec 2012 15:37:30 -0800 >> Joe Perches <j...@perches.com> wrote: >>> Can you please pick this up for -next now and I'll >>> redo my patches against -next for -rc1 so I'm not >>> delayed until 3.9? >> >> It would be better to do things in the other order. >> >> a) Your patches perform mainly code-movement which doesn't cause >> functional changes. Jan's patches are functional changes which >> require more thought and testing and possible fixups. > > Fine by me. Jan?
No problem. I agree with Andrew, that patches 9 to 14 could use indeed some more eyeballs. Patches 1 to 8 are more straight-forward, and I would consider these ready. However, they are also those, where I probably won't have any trouble rebasing them on top of your changes. Anyway. Until now I always thought my patches will end up in the queue of some maintainer, so that I don't have to bother about _when_ posting my patches. Therefore: when should I repost a version rebased on top of Joe's changes? (If I'd get some opinions on 9 to 14 until then, all the better.) Regards Jan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
