Joonsoo Kim <js1...@gmail.com> writes: > migrate_pages() would return positive value in some failure case, > so 'ret > 0 ? 0 : ret' may be wrong. > This fix it and remove one dead statement. > > Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim <js1...@gmail.com> > Cc: Michal Nazarewicz <min...@mina86.com> > Cc: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprow...@samsung.com> > Cc: Minchan Kim <minc...@kernel.org> > Cc: Christoph Lameter <c...@linux.com>
Have you actually encountered this problem? If migrate_pages() fails
with a positive value, the code that you are removing kicks in and
-EBUSY is assigned to ret (now that I look at it, I think that in the
current code the "return ret > 0 ? 0 : ret;" statement could be reduced
to "return ret;"). Your code seems to be cleaner, but the commit
message does not look accurate to me.
> diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
> index 4403009..02d4519 100644
> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> @@ -5673,7 +5673,6 @@ static int __alloc_contig_migrate_range(unsigned long
> start, unsigned long end)
> }
> tries = 0;
> } else if (++tries == 5) {
> - ret = ret < 0 ? ret : -EBUSY;
> break;
> }
>
> @@ -5683,7 +5682,7 @@ static int __alloc_contig_migrate_range(unsigned long
> start, unsigned long end)
> }
>
> putback_lru_pages(&cc.migratepages);
> - return ret > 0 ? 0 : ret;
> + return ret <= 0 ? ret : -EBUSY;
> }
>
> /*
--
Best regards, _ _
.o. | Liege of Serenly Enlightened Majesty of o' \,=./ `o
..o | Computer Science, Michal "mina86" Nazarewicz (o o)
ooo +-<mina86-mina86.com>-<jid:mina86-jabber.org>--ooO--(_)--Ooo--
pgpSXgkA24K95.pgp
Description: PGP signature
