On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 2:37 PM, Pekka Enberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 1:32 PM, Alexey Zaytsev
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The problem is not with enabling both b43 and bcm43xx (will, whis won't
> work
> > anyway, and there is no chance fixing it). The problem is with enabling
> the
> > bcm43xx wifi driver and the b44 Ethernet driver. The ethernet driver then
> > wrongly autosolects some config options that prevent the bcm43xx
> > driver from loading, so I'm left with either no wifi or no ethenet.
>
> So does reverting commit 753f492093da7a40141bfe083073400f518f4c68
> ("[B44]: port to native ssb support") fix the regression?
>
Compiling it right now.
I'm sure it fixes the problem, but I don't feel like we should revert
it. I can't
be sure it won't cause any other problems, and anyway, this does not look
right a solution. Any other driver (rightfully) requiring the SSB_HOST would
then also break the bcm43xx driver.
I'll send an simplified patch in a few minutes.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
