On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 2:57 PM, Pekka J Enberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Alexey,
>
>
> On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 2:37 PM, Pekka Enberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > So does reverting commit 753f492093da7a40141bfe083073400f518f4c68
> > > ("[B44]: port to native ssb support") fix the regression?
> > >
>
>
> On Sat, 23 Feb 2008, Alexey Zaytsev wrote:
> > Compiling it right now.
> >
> > I'm sure it fixes the problem, but I don't feel like we should revert
> > it. I can't
> > be sure it won't cause any other problems, and anyway, this does not look
> > right a solution. Any other driver (rightfully) requiring the SSB_HOST
> would
> > then also break the bcm43xx driver.
> >
> > I'll send an simplified patch in a few minutes.
>
> The point here is that it's Michael's patch and I don't want to start
> blaming anyone until you've verified it actually broke your setup. And if
> the problem was actually caused by that patch, Michael needs to either ACK
> your patch or fix it himself.
Yes, the problem was caused by this patch. With it reverted, I've got
both ethernet
and wifi working.
>
> Pekka
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
