On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 11:12 PM, Michael Buesch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Friday 22 February 2008 21:06:00 Alexey Zaytsev wrote: > > > It is not my problem, if you refuse to use b43. > > > You also still refuse to tell me details about your card and _what_ > > > does not work. I do own lots of different card and they > > > all work fine with b43. There's one exception, the 4311 rev 3 (or > something, > > > don't quite remember). But patches are available and will ship in > 2.6.25. > > > bcm43xx won't get removed until that shipped. > > > > Yes, it's a 4311 rev 01, but I'm probably was just too lame to upgrade the > > firmware or something. :E > > > > I really don't get it, what is going on here? You state that the new b32 > driver > > has problems on some hardware, where the old bcm43xx driver just works. > > And at the same time, you are surprised that I "refuse" to use the b43 > driver > > and push patches for the bcm43xx driver you broke... Oh, really, why?! > > So, please find someone who will sign-off your patch. I won't. > What's so hard to understand about that? Do I _have_ to sign off all patches > random people send to me? > I do _not_ want to be made responsible for that patch by signing it off. > It is as simple as that. > And I officially do not care about bcm43xx since a year and a half anymore. > So why should I ACK it or sign it off? >
I thought that there was a rule that if you break something in the kernel, you normally would be the one who fixes things up. Sorry, it looks I was wrong. I'll resend the patch directly to Greg KH and Jeff Garzik for -stable and 2.6.25 inclusion. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
