Hi Ted, On Mon, 18 May 2026 at 14:26, Theodore Tso <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, May 18, 2026 at 11:04:29AM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: > > > Sashiko is supporting various LLMs, including open models - it’s just a > > > practical > > > choice: to my knowledge the quality of open models is not on par with > > > frontier closed > > > models and it would require a non-trivial amount of hardware and > > > infrastructure to run > > > an open model at the required scale. > > > > In the context of the "Reviewed-by: Sashiko" discussion, this actually > > makes it really hard to assess the quality of those reviews. > > Agreed. There's a reason why the coding-assistants.rst specifies the > model which is used: > > Assisted-by: AGENT_NAME:MODEL_VERSION [TOOL1] [TOOL2] > > The problem is that (as Jon has pointed out) coding-assistants.rst was > intended for use when the tool was beging used to help create the code > --- that is, "Coding Assistants". What we're doing here is more of a > reviewer assistance. Something like: > > Scanned-by: AGENT_NAME:MODEL_VERSION [TOOL1] [TOOL2] > > Would be more interesting, but it doesn't actually tell us anything > about what the results were of the scan.
Indeed. Scanned-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]> Doesn't say much more than the RFC2822 "Receved:"-header, and thus not meant to be saved for posterity in git history ;-) Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- [email protected] In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds
