On 16/05/2026 17:49, Roman Gushchin wrote: >> >>> I’m not attached to any specific form of it, I thought Reviewed-by is the >>> most obvious form. >>> And we use Reported-by: tags with various tooling for years. >> >> Reported-by: shows the existance of a problem that some tool found, a >> subtle difference here. >> >>> What do you think is the best form? >>> >>> I’ll pause sending reviewed-by tags until we have a discussion and >>> agreement here. >> >> Just say it in some other text form, that our tools will not pick up. >> Like: >> Tool XXXX reports that all is good: >> https://.... >> >> or something like that? > > Sure, works for me. Roman, Before implementing such changes, send a RFC or just ask a few folks for opinions. We do use the tool, among other tools, so we will gladly provide a feedback.
Sashiko should in general not send such emails when not asked for. Why? Because we have also other bots, like LKP, KernelCI, and imagine how maintainer's mailbox will look like. LKP allows opt-in for your own repo, which for example I am using, so I get confirmation of the success. But people are not receiving them. I cannot imagine all the people getting these LKP-successfully-built emails on every email. Best regards, Krzysztof
