On 2025-04-29 12:52:56-0600, Shuah Khan wrote: > On 4/24/25 14:06, Shuah Khan wrote: > > On 4/22/25 02:51, Willy Tarreau wrote: > > > Hi Thomas, > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 22, 2025 at 10:48:28AM +0200, Thomas Weißschuh wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > On Fri, Apr 11, 2025 at 11:00:24AM +0200, Thomas Weißschuh wrote: > > > > > Nolibc is useful for selftests as the test programs can be very small, > > > > > and compiled with just a kernel crosscompiler, without userspace > > > > > support. > > > > > Currently nolibc is only usable with kselftest.h, not the more > > > > > convenient to use kselftest_harness.h > > > > > This series provides this compatibility by adding new features to > > > > > nolibc > > > > > and removing the usage of problematic features from the harness. > > > > > > > > > > The first half of the series are changes to the harness, the second > > > > > one > > > > > are for nolibc. Both parts are very independent and should go through > > > > > different trees. > > > > > > > > I need a few nolibc bits of this series (snprintf() and prep patches) > > > > to base > > > > further patches on. For that I'd like to pick up all the nolibc patches > > > > from > > > > this series through the nolibc tree. They got Acks from Willy. > > > > > > > > Any objections? > > > > > > No objection on my side! > > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > Kees, do you have any comments on this series? If you are okay > > with it, I would like to apply this for next. > > > > Thomas, > > Can this be part of no libc pull request for 6.16-rc1 which I will > be fielding this time around?
Sure, I'll pick it up. > If so here is my Ack > Acked-by: Shuah Khan <sk...@linuxfoundation.org> Thanks, Thomas
