On 4/24/25 14:06, Shuah Khan wrote:
On 4/22/25 02:51, Willy Tarreau wrote:
Hi Thomas,
On Tue, Apr 22, 2025 at 10:48:28AM +0200, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 11, 2025 at 11:00:24AM +0200, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
Nolibc is useful for selftests as the test programs can be very small,
and compiled with just a kernel crosscompiler, without userspace support.
Currently nolibc is only usable with kselftest.h, not the more
convenient to use kselftest_harness.h
This series provides this compatibility by adding new features to nolibc
and removing the usage of problematic features from the harness.
The first half of the series are changes to the harness, the second one
are for nolibc. Both parts are very independent and should go through
different trees.
I need a few nolibc bits of this series (snprintf() and prep patches) to base
further patches on. For that I'd like to pick up all the nolibc patches from
this series through the nolibc tree. They got Acks from Willy.
Any objections?
No objection on my side!
Thanks.
Kees, do you have any comments on this series? If you are okay
with it, I would like to apply this for next.
Thomas,
Can this be part of no libc pull request for 6.16-rc1 which I will
be fielding this time around?
If so here is my Ack
Acked-by: Shuah Khan <sk...@linuxfoundation.org>
thanks,
-- Shuah
