Hi Thomas, On Tue, Apr 22, 2025 at 10:48:28AM +0200, Thomas Weißschuh wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, Apr 11, 2025 at 11:00:24AM +0200, Thomas Weißschuh wrote: > > Nolibc is useful for selftests as the test programs can be very small, > > and compiled with just a kernel crosscompiler, without userspace support. > > Currently nolibc is only usable with kselftest.h, not the more > > convenient to use kselftest_harness.h > > This series provides this compatibility by adding new features to nolibc > > and removing the usage of problematic features from the harness. > > > > The first half of the series are changes to the harness, the second one > > are for nolibc. Both parts are very independent and should go through > > different trees. > > I need a few nolibc bits of this series (snprintf() and prep patches) to base > further patches on. For that I'd like to pick up all the nolibc patches from > this series through the nolibc tree. They got Acks from Willy. > > Any objections?
No objection on my side! Willy
