On Thu, Mar 06, 2025 at 06:00:17PM +0100, Thomas Weißschuh wrote: > On 2025-03-04 07:58:19+0000, Louis Taylor wrote: > > It was mentioned that a new test_ function should be static, so go back > > over existing functions and mark those static as well. > > Actually Willy wants these non-static for debugging purposes. > I can't seem to get that into my head -.- > Let's drop this one.
I don't remember but it was probably to be able to break into them with gdb and/or to check the disassembled code when in doubt about anything. Willy
