On 2025-03-04 07:58:19+0000, Louis Taylor wrote:
> It was mentioned that a new test_ function should be static, so go back
> over existing functions and mark those static as well.
Actually Willy wants these non-static for debugging purposes.
I can't seem to get that into my head -.-
Let's drop this one.
> Signed-off-by: Louis Taylor <lo...@kragniz.eu>
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c | 14 +++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c
> b/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c
> index 2a1629938dd6..b5464ca8d050 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c
> @@ -807,7 +807,7 @@ static int test_dirent(void)
> return 0;
> }
>
> -int test_getpagesize(void)
> +static int test_getpagesize(void)
> {
> int x = getpagesize();
> int c;
> @@ -836,7 +836,7 @@ int test_getpagesize(void)
> return !c;
> }
>
> -int test_fork(void)
> +static int test_fork(void)
> {
> int status;
> pid_t pid;
> @@ -861,7 +861,7 @@ int test_fork(void)
> }
> }
>
> -int test_stat_timestamps(void)
> +static int test_stat_timestamps(void)
> {
> struct stat st;
>
> @@ -883,7 +883,7 @@ int test_stat_timestamps(void)
> return 0;
> }
>
> -int test_uname(void)
> +static int test_uname(void)
> {
> struct utsname buf;
> char osrelease[sizeof(buf.release)];
> @@ -922,7 +922,7 @@ int test_uname(void)
> return 0;
> }
>
> -int test_mmap_munmap(void)
> +static int test_mmap_munmap(void)
> {
> int ret, fd, i, page_size;
> void *mem;
> @@ -980,7 +980,7 @@ int test_mmap_munmap(void)
> return !!ret;
> }
>
> -int test_pipe(void)
> +static int test_pipe(void)
> {
> const char *const msg = "hello, nolibc";
> int pipefd[2];
> @@ -1001,7 +1001,7 @@ int test_pipe(void)
> return !!memcmp(buf, msg, len);
> }
>
> -int test_rlimit(void)
> +static int test_rlimit(void)
> {
> struct rlimit rlim = {
> .rlim_cur = 1 << 20,
> --
> 2.45.2
>
