James Sutherland wrote: > I was not suggesting ignoring these. OTOH, there is no reason to treat an > RST packet as "go away and never ever send traffic to this host again" - > i.e. trying another TCP connection, this time with ECN disabled, would be > acceptable. Using a different source port number, even. -- Jamie - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: hotmail not dealin... Jamie Lokier
- Re: hotmail not dealin... James Sutherland
- Re: hotmail not deali... Lars Marowsky-Bree
- Re: hotmail not deali... James Sutherland
- Re: hotmail not deali... Chris Ricker
- Re: hotmail not dealin... Henning P. Schmiedehausen
- Re: hotmail not dealin... Matti Aarnio
- Re: hotmail not dealin... Jeremy M. Dolan
- Re: hotmail not dealin... Jamie Lokier
- Re: hotmail not dealin... Drago Goricanec
- Re: hotmail not dealin... Jamie Lokier
- Re: hotmail not dealin... Olaf Titz
- Re: hotmail not dealin... Jamie Lokier
- Re: hotmail not dealin... David S. Miller
- Re: hotmail not deali... Lars Marowsky-Bree
- Re: hotmail not deali... David S. Miller
- Re: hotmail not dealin... Jamie Lokier
- Re: hotmail not dealin... Thunder from the hill
- Re: hotmail not dealing wi... Thunder from the hill
- Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Bernd Eckenfels
- Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Bernd Eckenfels