Lars Marowsky-Bree writes: > That would mean that the people worried about this should write a > wrapper-library for the connect() call, and maybe add a no_ecn flag to a > socket, and leave the kernel alone. I'm not adding a no_ecn option for sockets. See my response to Matti Aarnio earlier today on this list for the reasons why. People must fix their firewalls, there is no other way to fix the problem and get ECN properly deployed. I'm ceasing conversation on this thread from this point forward. Later, David S. Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: hotmail not dealin... Henning P. Schmiedehausen
- Re: hotmail not dealin... Matti Aarnio
- Re: hotmail not dealin... Jeremy M. Dolan
- Re: hotmail not dealin... Jamie Lokier
- Re: hotmail not dealin... Drago Goricanec
- Re: hotmail not dealin... Jamie Lokier
- Re: hotmail not dealin... Olaf Titz
- Re: hotmail not dealin... Jamie Lokier
- Re: hotmail not dealin... David S. Miller
- Re: hotmail not deali... Lars Marowsky-Bree
- Re: hotmail not dealin... David S. Miller
- Re: hotmail not dealin... Jamie Lokier
- Re: hotmail not dealin... Thunder from the hill
- Re: hotmail not dealing wi... Thunder from the hill
- Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Bernd Eckenfels
- Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Bernd Eckenfels
- RE: hotmail not dealing with ECN Randal, Phil
- Re: RE: hotmail not dealing with ECN Lars Marowsky-Bree
- Re: RE: hotmail not dealing with ECN James Sutherland
- Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Daniel Chemko
- Re: hotmail not dealing with EC... Chris Meadors