On Fri, 26 Jan 2001, James Sutherland wrote: > Except you can't retry without ECN, because DaveM wants to do a Microsoft > and force ECN on everyone, whether they like it or not. Don't be absurd. It's a compile-time option that nobody, not even Dave Miller, is forcing you to compile into your kernel. > If ECN is so wonderful, why doesn't anybody actually WANT to use it > anyway? Lots of people do. Lots of other people (such as, in this case, hotmail) will never upgrade their software until the groundswell of complaints is more expensive than their perception of the cost of upgrading.... later, chris -- Chris Ricker [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Jamie Lokier
- Re: ECN -? Anything _I_ need to do to allo... List User
- Re: ECN -? Anything _I_ need to do to allo... Matti Aarnio
- Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN David S. Miller
- Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN James Sutherland
- Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN David S. Miller
- Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Jamie Lokier
- Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN James Sutherland
- Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Lars Marowsky-Bree
- Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN James Sutherland
- Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Chris Ricker
- Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Henning P. Schmiedehausen
- Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Matti Aarnio
- Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Jeremy M. Dolan
- Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Jamie Lokier
- Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Drago Goricanec
- Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Jamie Lokier
- Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Olaf Titz
- Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Jamie Lokier
- Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN David S. Miller
- Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Lars Marowsky-Bree