Hi Dave, How are the VB withdrawal symptoms going? :) > Anton, why are you always returning -1 (which means error for the > smb_message[] array functions) when using sendfile? Returning -1 tells the higher level code that we actually sent the bytes out ourselves and not to bother doing it. > Aren't you supposed to return the number of bytes output or > something like this? Only if you want the code to do a send() on outbuf which we dont here. Cheers, Anton - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Jakub Jelinek
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? David L. Parsley
- RE: Is sendfile all that sexy? Laramie Leavitt
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? dean gaudet
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Sasi Peter
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? James Sutherland
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Anton Blanchard
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Sasi Peter
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Anton Blanchard
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? David S. Miller
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Anton Blanchard
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Pavel Machek
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? jamal
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Pavel Machek
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Andries . Brouwer
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Ton Hospel
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Steve VanDevender
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Ton Hospel
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Ben Mansell
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Linus Torvalds
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Olivier Galibert