On Tue, 16 Jan 2001, Pavel Machek wrote: > > TWO observations: > > - Given Linux's non-pre-emptability of the kernel i get the feeling that > > sendfile could starve other user space programs. Imagine trying to send a > > 1Gig file on 10Mbps pipe in one shot. > > Hehe, try sigkilling process doing that transfer. Last time I tried it > it did not work. >From Alexey's response: it does get descheduled possibly every sndbuf send. So you should be able to sneak that sigkill. cheers, jamal - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- RE: Is sendfile all that sexy? Laramie Leavitt
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? dean gaudet
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Sasi Peter
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? James Sutherland
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Anton Blanchard
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Sasi Peter
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Anton Blanchard
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? David S. Miller
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Anton Blanchard
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Pavel Machek
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? jamal
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Pavel Machek
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Andries . Brouwer
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Ton Hospel
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Steve VanDevender
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Ton Hospel
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Ben Mansell
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Linus Torvalds
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Olivier Galibert
- RE: Is sendfile all that sexy? LA Walsh
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Rogier Wolff