> No plans for samba to use sendfile? Even better make it a tux-like module? > (that would enable Netware-Linux like performance with the standard > kernel... would be cool afterall ;) I have patches for samba to do sendfile. Making a tux module does not make sense to me, especially since we are nowhere near the limits of samba in userspace. Once userspace samba can run no faster, then we should think about other options. Anton - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Felix von Leitner
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Jamie Lokier
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Felix von Leitner
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? David L. Parsley
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Jakub Jelinek
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? David L. Parsley
- RE: Is sendfile all that sexy? Laramie Leavitt
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? dean gaudet
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Sasi Peter
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? James Sutherland
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Anton Blanchard
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Sasi Peter
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Anton Blanchard
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? David S. Miller
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Anton Blanchard
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Pavel Machek
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? jamal
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Pavel Machek
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Andries . Brouwer
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Ton Hospel
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Steve VanDevender