On Fri, 26 Jan 2001, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote: > On 2001-01-26T16:04:03, > "Randal, Phil" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > > We may be right, "they" may be wrong, but in the real world > > arrogance rarely wins anyone friends. > > So you also turn of PMTU and just set the MTU to 200 bytes because broken > firewalls may drop ICMP ? No - a workaround is used to detect such "black holes". Much as I was advocating for ECN, in fact. Also note that some firewalls (Microsoft's in particular) DO drop ICMP packets. James. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: hotmail not dealin... David S. Miller
- Re: hotmail not deali... Lars Marowsky-Bree
- Re: hotmail not deali... David S. Miller
- Re: hotmail not dealin... Jamie Lokier
- Re: hotmail not dealin... Thunder from the hill
- Re: hotmail not dealing wi... Thunder from the hill
- Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Bernd Eckenfels
- Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Bernd Eckenfels
- RE: hotmail not dealing with ECN Randal, Phil
- Re: RE: hotmail not dealing with ECN Lars Marowsky-Bree
- Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN James Sutherland
- Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Daniel Chemko
- Re: hotmail not dealing with EC... Chris Meadors
- Re: hotmail not dealing wi... Thunder from the hill
- Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Tony Hoyle
- Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Henning P. Schmiedehausen
- Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Alan Cox
- Re: RE: hotmail not dealing with ECN Albert D. Cahalan
- Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Miquel van Smoorenburg
- Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN David Ford
- Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Helge Hafting