James Sutherland writes: > A delayed retry without ECN might be a good compromise... > > Every single connection to ECN-broken sites would work as normal - it > would just take an extra few seconds. Instead of "Hotmail doesn't > work!" it becomes "Hrm... Hotmail is fscking slow, but Yahoo is fine. I'll > use Yahoo". A few million of those, and suddenly Hotmail isn't so hot... No, as explained in previous emails, no retry scheme can work. Hotmails failing machines, for example, send RST packets back when they see ECN. Ignoring valid TCP RST frames is unacceptable and Linux will not do that as long as I am maintaining it. Later, David S. Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- ECN Simon Kirby
- Re: ECN Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Jamie Lokier
- Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN H. Peter Anvin
- Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Marian Jancar
- Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN H. Peter Anvin
- Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Dax Kelson
- Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Jamie Lokier
- Re: ECN -? Anything _I_ need to do to allo... List User
- Re: ECN -? Anything _I_ need to do to allo... Matti Aarnio
- Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN David S. Miller
- Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN James Sutherland
- Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN David S. Miller
- Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Jamie Lokier
- Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN James Sutherland
- Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Lars Marowsky-Bree
- Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN James Sutherland
- Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Chris Ricker
- Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Henning P. Schmiedehausen
- Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Matti Aarnio
- Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Jeremy M. Dolan