On Thu, 2008-01-10 at 23:47 +0100, Paolo Ciarrocchi wrote: > On Jan 10, 2008 11:41 PM, Daniel Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On Thu, 2008-01-10 at 23:35 +0100, Paolo Ciarrocchi wrote: > > > On Jan 10, 2008 9:03 PM, Daniel Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > I was playing with checkpatch.pl ;) .. I made a list of style offenders > > > > inside the arch/x86/ sub-directory. I thought it might be helpful to > > > > prioritize any style clean ups that people might want to do for x86 .. > > > > OTOH some of these might show imperfections in checkpatch.pl .. Either > > > > way I thought it was interesting to review .. > > > > > > > > These are sorted by errors, then warnings.. I only included the first > > > > hundred files which includes about the top %30 of the list .. The > > > > kprobes_64.c error rate is a little miss-leading because several errors > > > > are found on a single line .. > > > > > > I just pulled > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/x86/linux-2.6-x86 mm > > > > > > > ./arch/x86/math-emu/fpu_trig.c > > > > total: 649 errors, 11 warnings, 1845 lines checked > > > > Ok, looks like people have been busy .. I was using Linus's git, which > > was handy at the time I ran the test .. > > Do you have a script aroung checkpatch.pl for collecting the statistics > you posted? If so, I can run it agains the x86 git tree and report the output.
I was just about to do that .. It was actually several one-liner type scripts which I strung together .. I'll send and updated list in a bit.. Daniel -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
