On Jan 10, 2008 9:03 PM, Daniel Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I was playing with checkpatch.pl ;) .. I made a list of style offenders > inside the arch/x86/ sub-directory. I thought it might be helpful to > prioritize any style clean ups that people might want to do for x86 .. > OTOH some of these might show imperfections in checkpatch.pl .. Either > way I thought it was interesting to review .. > > These are sorted by errors, then warnings.. I only included the first > hundred files which includes about the top %30 of the list .. The > kprobes_64.c error rate is a little miss-leading because several errors > are found on a single line ..
I just pulled git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/x86/linux-2.6-x86 mm > ./arch/x86/math-emu/fpu_trig.c > total: 649 errors, 11 warnings, 1845 lines checked On that tree checkpatch reports: total: 5 errors, 54 warnings, 1643 lines checked > ./arch/x86/kernel/kprobes_64.c > total: 528 errors, 9 warnings, 749 lines checked total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 1 lines checked > ./arch/x86/math-emu/reg_ld_str.c > total: 392 errors, 17 warnings, 1375 lines checked total: 8 errors, 39 warnings, 1224 lines checked > ./arch/x86/kernel/kprobes_32.c > total: 271 errors, 8 warnings, 756 lines checked total: 1 errors, 0 warnings, 0 lines checked > ./arch/x86/math-emu/errors.c > total: 214 errors, 28 warnings, 739 lines checked total: 26 errors, 36 warnings, 689 lines checked So it looks like a lot of errors are fixed in the x86 git tree. Regards, -- Paolo http://paolo.ciarrocchi.googlepages.com/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
