On 26/10/2020 07:23:26+0000, Qiang Zhao wrote: > Any update for this patchset? >
The whole point would be to get the DT and the watchdog maintainers agree on the property name. Once done, the driver implementation is trivial and will get applied. > Best Regards > Qiang Zhao > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Uwe Kleine-König <[email protected]> > > Sent: 2020年9月24日 18:53 > > To: Alexandre Belloni <[email protected]>; Qiang Zhao > > <[email protected]>; Bruno Thomsen <[email protected]> > > Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; > > [email protected]; [email protected]; > > [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; > > Wim Van Sebroeck <[email protected]>; Guenter Roeck > > <[email protected]> > > Subject: [PATCH 0/2] rtc: pcf2127: only use watchdog when explicitly > > available > > > > Hello, > > > > now that there are two people stumbling over the pcf2127 driver providing a > > non-functional watchdog device, here comes an RFC patch to address this. > > > > Note this is only compile tested and dt-documentation is still missing. > > Still send this series because the cleanup is nice independent of this > > discussion > > and to have something to argue about. > > > > Does someone can offer a better name than "has-watchdog", is there a scheme > > that could be used already that I'm not aware of? > > > > Best regards > > Uwe > > > > Uwe Kleine-König (2): > > rtc: pcf2127: move watchdog initialisation to a separate function > > [RFC] rtc: pcf2127: only use watchdog when explicitly available > > > > drivers/rtc/rtc-pcf2127.c | 57 ++++++++++++++++++++++----------------- > > 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-) > > > > -- > > 2.28.0 > -- Alexandre Belloni, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com
