Any update for this patchset?

Best Regards
Qiang Zhao

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Uwe Kleine-König <[email protected]>
> Sent: 2020年9月24日 18:53
> To: Alexandre Belloni <[email protected]>; Qiang Zhao
> <[email protected]>; Bruno Thomsen <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
> Wim Van Sebroeck <[email protected]>; Guenter Roeck
> <[email protected]>
> Subject: [PATCH 0/2] rtc: pcf2127: only use watchdog when explicitly available
> 
> Hello,
> 
> now that there are two people stumbling over the pcf2127 driver providing a
> non-functional watchdog device, here comes an RFC patch to address this.
> 
> Note this is only compile tested and dt-documentation is still missing.
> Still send this series because the cleanup is nice independent of this 
> discussion
> and to have something to argue about.
> 
> Does someone can offer a better name than "has-watchdog", is there a scheme
> that could be used already that I'm not aware of?
> 
> Best regards
> Uwe
> 
> Uwe Kleine-König (2):
>   rtc: pcf2127: move watchdog initialisation to a separate function
>   [RFC] rtc: pcf2127: only use watchdog when explicitly available
> 
>  drivers/rtc/rtc-pcf2127.c | 57 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
>  1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
> 
> --
> 2.28.0

Reply via email to