On Sat, 3 Oct 2020 09:51:00 +0200 Jiri Pirko wrote:
> > enum devlink_attr {
> > /* don't change the order or add anything between, this is ABI! */
> > DEVLINK_ATTR_UNSPEC,
> >@@ -507,6 +524,7 @@ enum devlink_attr {
> >
> > DEVLINK_ATTR_RELOAD_ACTION, /* u8 */
> > DEVLINK_ATTR_RELOAD_ACTIONS_PERFORMED, /* u64 */
> >+ DEVLINK_ATTR_RELOAD_LIMIT, /* u8 */
>
> Hmm, why there could be specified only single "limit"? I believe this
> should be a bitfield. Same for the internal api to the driver.
Hm I was expecting limits to be ordered (in maths sense) but you're
right perhaps that can't be always guaranteed.
Also - Moshe please double check that there will not be any kdoc
warnings here - I just learned that W=1 builds don't check headers
but I'll fix up my bot by the time you post v2.
