On Wed, 19 Aug 2020 at 11:30, Will Deacon <w...@kernel.org> wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 11:01:38AM -0600, Mathieu Poirier wrote: > > On Tue, 18 Aug 2020 at 11:56, John Garry <john.ga...@huawei.com> wrote: > > > On 17/08/2020 20:31, Mathieu Poirier wrote: > > > > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS > > > > index 4e2698cc7e23..f9bb76baeec9 100644 > > > > --- a/MAINTAINERS > > > > +++ b/MAINTAINERS > > > > @@ -13427,8 +13427,18 @@ F: tools/perf/ > > > > PERFORMANCE EVENTS SUBSYSTEM ARM64 PMU EVENTS > > > > R: John Garry <john.ga...@huawei.com> > > > > R: Will Deacon <w...@kernel.org> > > > > +R: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poir...@linaro.org> > > > > +R: Leo Yan <leo....@linaro.org> > > > > L: linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org (moderated for > > > > non-subscribers) > > > > S: Supported > > > > +F: tools/build/feature/test-libopencsd.c > > > > +F: tools/perf/arch/arm/util/auxtrace.c > > > > +F: tools/perf/arch/arm/util/cs-etm.* > > > > +F: tools/perf/arch/arm/util/pmu.c > > > > +F: tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/arm-spe.c > > > > +F: tools/perf/util/arm-spe.h > > > > +F: tools/perf/util/cs-etm-decoder/* > > > > +F: tools/perf/util/cs-etm.* > > > > > > But from the previous discussion, I thought that we wanted an entry to > > > cover all tools/perf/arch/arm64/ and other related folders. Or was it > > > just put all special interest parts (like SPE support) under one entry > > > and leave the other arm/arm64 parts to be caught by "PERFORMANCE EVENTS > > > SUBSYSTEM" entry? > > > > I do not have the time to maintain anything outside of coresight - > > listing individual files as I did removes any ambiguity on that front. > > I'm happy to add tools/perf/arch/arm and tools/perf/arch/arm64/ if you > > agree to maintain them. In that case you will have to be more > > specific about the "other related folders" you are referring to above. > > None of us have time for this, hence why I think putting us all in one entry > with all of the files listed there makes the most sense; then people do > whatever they can and try to help each other out based on how much time they > have. I think that's much better than fine-grained maintainership where a > given file has a single point of failure.
Thanks for the clarification - just wanted to make sure I don't sign you guys up for something you didn't agree to. > > So I think it should include: > > tools/perf/arch/arm64/ > tools/pmu-events/arch/arm64/ > > along with the SPE and Coresight files. > > Arnaldo would still handle the patches, so this is really about giving us a > chance to review incoming patches without having to fish them out from the > lists. > > Will
