On Tue, 18 Aug 2020 at 11:56, John Garry <john.ga...@huawei.com> wrote: > > On 17/08/2020 20:31, Mathieu Poirier wrote: > > Add entries for perf tools elements related to the support of > > Arm CoreSight and Arm SPE. > > Thanks for doing this... > > > > > Signed-off-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poir...@linaro.org> > > --- > > MAINTAINERS | 10 ++++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS > > index 4e2698cc7e23..f9bb76baeec9 100644 > > --- a/MAINTAINERS > > +++ b/MAINTAINERS > > @@ -13427,8 +13427,18 @@ F: tools/perf/ > > PERFORMANCE EVENTS SUBSYSTEM ARM64 PMU EVENTS > > R: John Garry <john.ga...@huawei.com> > > R: Will Deacon <w...@kernel.org> > > +R: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poir...@linaro.org> > > +R: Leo Yan <leo....@linaro.org> > > L: linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org (moderated for non-subscribers) > > S: Supported > > +F: tools/build/feature/test-libopencsd.c > > +F: tools/perf/arch/arm/util/auxtrace.c > > +F: tools/perf/arch/arm/util/cs-etm.* > > +F: tools/perf/arch/arm/util/pmu.c > > +F: tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/arm-spe.c > > +F: tools/perf/util/arm-spe.h > > +F: tools/perf/util/cs-etm-decoder/* > > +F: tools/perf/util/cs-etm.* > > But from the previous discussion, I thought that we wanted an entry to > cover all tools/perf/arch/arm64/ and other related folders. Or was it > just put all special interest parts (like SPE support) under one entry > and leave the other arm/arm64 parts to be caught by "PERFORMANCE EVENTS > SUBSYSTEM" entry?
I do not have the time to maintain anything outside of coresight - listing individual files as I did removes any ambiguity on that front. I'm happy to add tools/perf/arch/arm and tools/perf/arch/arm64/ if you agree to maintain them. In that case you will have to be more specific about the "other related folders" you are referring to above. Thanks, Mathieu > > Cheers, > John > > > F: tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/arm64/ > > > > PERSONALITY HANDLING > > >
