On 7/17/2020 4:19 PM, Scott Branden wrote:
> From: Rayagonda Kokatanur <rayagonda.kokata...@broadcom.com>
> 
> Handle clk_get_rate() returning 0 to avoid possible division by zero.
> 
> Fixes: daa5abc41c80 ("pwm: Add support for Broadcom iProc PWM controller")
> Signed-off-by: Rayagonda Kokatanur <rayagonda.kokata...@broadcom.com>
> Signed-off-by: Scott Branden <scott.bran...@broadcom.com>
> Reviewed-off-by: Ray Jui <ray....@broadcom.com>

Typo. Should be 'Reviewed-by: Ray Jui <ray....@broadcom.com>', :)

> 
> ---
> Changes from v2: update commit message to remove <= condition
> as clk_get_rate only returns value >= 0
> ---
>  drivers/pwm/pwm-bcm-iproc.c | 9 +++++++--
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-bcm-iproc.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-bcm-iproc.c
> index 1f829edd8ee7..d392a828fc49 100644
> --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-bcm-iproc.c
> +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-bcm-iproc.c
> @@ -85,8 +85,6 @@ static void iproc_pwmc_get_state(struct pwm_chip *chip, 
> struct pwm_device *pwm,
>       u64 tmp, multi, rate;
>       u32 value, prescale;
>  
> -     rate = clk_get_rate(ip->clk);
> -
>       value = readl(ip->base + IPROC_PWM_CTRL_OFFSET);
>  
>       if (value & BIT(IPROC_PWM_CTRL_EN_SHIFT(pwm->hwpwm)))
> @@ -99,6 +97,13 @@ static void iproc_pwmc_get_state(struct pwm_chip *chip, 
> struct pwm_device *pwm,
>       else
>               state->polarity = PWM_POLARITY_INVERSED;
>  
> +     rate = clk_get_rate(ip->clk);
> +     if (rate == 0) {
> +             state->period = 0;
> +             state->duty_cycle = 0;
> +             return;
> +     }
> +
>       value = readl(ip->base + IPROC_PWM_PRESCALE_OFFSET);
>       prescale = value >> IPROC_PWM_PRESCALE_SHIFT(pwm->hwpwm);
>       prescale &= IPROC_PWM_PRESCALE_MAX;
> 

Reply via email to